By Diane Bartz
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Friday ruled in favor of U.S. Sugar Corp’s plans to buy rival Imperial Sugar Co, rejecting a Justice Department argument that the proposed deal would drive up the price of sugar for households as well as for food and soda makers.
The Justice Department said in a lawsuit filed last November that the $315 million deal would give U.S. Sugar, owner and member of a cooperative with three other companies, and American Sugar Refining, which sells under the Domino brand, some 75% of refined sugar sales in the U.S. southeast.
U.S. Sugar said in a statement that it was “pleased” with the decision. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It can appeal the loss.
Judge Maryellen Noreika of the U.S. District Court for Delaware issued the opinion under seal and said a redacted version would be available.
The government, which called U.S. Sugar “the world’s largest vertically-integrated cane sugar milling and refining operation,” argued that the deal would lead to higher sugar prices in the southeastern United States, saying the two companies often compete to win contracts from companies that make drinks, snacks and other prepared foods.
The companies argued that sugar was easy to transport so that restricting the market to the southeast was a mistake. They also argued that Imperial is a high-priced competitor that purchases raw sugar to refine and does not compete to lower prices.
They also argued that the U.S. Department of Agriculture monitors sugar prices and can increase imports if needed to address price increases.